The United States is Learning that Strategic Might Begins with Fiscal Responsibility

America’s Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta announced this week a deep cut in the United States’ defence budget starting from 2013. The cuts will mainly hit American ground forces which will be reduced by 13%. The army will lose some 80,000 soldiers and the marines a further 20,000. The air force and the navy will be hit less hard, although the production and deployment of new aircraft like the F-35 stealth fighter will be slowed down, also affecting the timetable for the arrival of these aircraft to the Israeli Air Force. The American navy will keep all of its 11 aircraft carriers except for a short period between the decommissioning of its oldest carrier, the Enterprise, and the entry into service of its modern replacement, the Gerald R. Ford which is currently under construction.

As far as the spread of burden, these are probably the least damaging choices. It is much easier to rebuild ground forces rapidly then to recall to service air and sea units or replace them with new ones. The United States army also has a large contingency of reserve and National Guard forces. Britain, which was also badly hit by the global recession, learnt the lessons of budget cuts to air and sea units when a few weeks after it decommissioned its Sea Harrier jets and the aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal and converted its last remaining carrier, HMS Illustrious, to carry helicopters, British forces were called upon to implement a no-fly zone over Libya and to attack ground targets from the air. The Argentinians are also sensing this weakness, and 30 years after the Folklands War in which Sea Harrier jets, taking off from older carriers, had an important part to play in Britain’s victory, voices are getting louder in Buenos Aires calling for the retake of the disputed islands by force.

It is very likely that this is not the end of the cuts story. Continuing economic pressures will dictate further and deeper cuts in the not too distant future. The hits sustained by the American defence budget are a direct result of the global economic crisis, and this crisis is a direct result of the irresponsible conduct of American banks which for years approved the lending of hundreds of billions of dollars in sub-prime mortgages to people who stood no chance of repaying them, against property assets that were worth far less than their highly inflated paper value suggested. These loans were then packaged in securities that masked their true identity and were sold to other banks in the US and around the world. When the bubble finally burst, these banks discovered that the securities they were holding were worthless. Very few people were called to task for this irresponsible behaviour. When the United States and other countries are now forced to make painful cuts to their defence budgets, they better remember the direct link between fiscal responsibility and strategic might.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The United States is Learning that Strategic Might Begins with Fiscal Responsibility

  1. Dear MCP,

    The military cuts you write about are a drop in the bucket. After 100,000 ground troopes, tired from the silly 9 year advanture in Iraq, had returned home, plus another similar number of beaten-up troops planned to come back from Afganistan, this year hopefully, the best thing would be is to give them a break. To let them go home (if they can find a job).

    Last week, we learned about the navy seals’s rescue operation in Somalia, a complicated and darring move (another medal to Obama), that highlighted the need of a different military power for the future. These cuts will save a lot of money and will enable to regroup and retrain.

    The theory about ‘nation building’ in Iraq and Afganistan that George Bush fed the American people, that cost about 8 trillion dollars, is the main reason for the dire economic situation the US finds itself. The sub-prime mortgage fiasco, by itself the ‘great design’ of relaxed banking regulations by the Bush administration, just added the frosting on the cake.

    Bottom line is that these cuts are past due. The focus should change: instead of concentrating on production of the F-35 (with out of control costs), the US needs better deep-penetrating bombs, and right away, so we can use them this spring, in Iran.

  2. Much Courage and Peace says:

    Hello Eitan and thanks for your comment.
    Last thing first – I could not agree more about the need for better deep-penetrating bombs – Panetta admitted a couple of days ago that the bombs in use now will not do the job. Apparently many GBU-28s were also supplied with faulty detonetors.
    The Iraq war was indeed a fiasco and I wrote about its price in a previous article. I refered mainly to the national security price – without the Iraq war the Obama administration would have been much more willing to consider an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. It also got in the way of completeing the job in Aphganistan.
    The sub-prime mortgages fiasco ended up costing taxpayers around the free worrld some three trillion dollars and nearly brought down the banking systems of several of them. It also brought the worst recession since 1929. Of course the cost of the two wars both to the US and Britain was huge, but it remained largely isolated from civil economic systems.
    Just one word to end – defence budgets nearly always reflect priorities dictated by previous wars – I hope they are preparing for the next war this time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s